1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows: (a) the three-party 1 of the first instance judgment “instant agreement” and the five-party 1 “instant contract” are each “instant sales contract”; and (b) the grounds for the first instance judgment are the same as that for the Defendant’s assertion in the trial, except for adding the following judgments as to the matters alleged in the trial; and (c) thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In addition, the defendant asserts that the judgment of the court of first instance, which judged on the premise that the boiler of this case was used at the same time even though it was not used at the same time, is unreasonable. However, according to the evidence No. 9-1 through No. 6, the defendant's use of the electric boiler of this case at the same time by the date, and the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court of first instance shows the evidence No. 12 and No. 13 (including each number) submitted by the defendant at the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are legitimate.

Therefore, the defendant's argument is without merit.

In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim should be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed on the grounds of its merit.