The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 사실오인 성폭력범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법 위반(장애인강제추행)의 점과 관련하여, 검사가 제출한 증거에 의하면, 피고인이 정신적인 장애가 있는 피해자의 젖꼭지를 만져 추행한 사실을 충분히 인정할 수 있다.

The judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant on this part of the facts charged is erroneous.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court (five years of imprisonment, 40 hours of completion of sexual assault treatment programs, and 5 years of employment restrictions such as children and juveniles-related institutions) is too uneasible and unfair.

2. 사실오인 주장에 대한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거를 기록과 대조하여 살펴보면, 원심이 판시와 같은 근거로 피고인이 정신적인 장애가 있는 피해자의 젖꼭지를 만져 추행한 사실이 합리적인 의심의 여지없이 증명되었다고 볼 수 없다는 이유로 이 부분 공소사실을 무죄로 판단한 것은 정당하고, 사실을 오인한 위법이 없다.

The prosecutor's assertion of mistake is without merit.

3. The instant crime of determining unfair sentencing is sexual intercourse after the Defendant led the victim of intellectual disability Grade 3 in the residential facility, such as the same disabled person and the homeless person, to the toilet, and the victim’s face, chest, bluri, etc., led the victim to the drinking room.

In light of the relationship between the defendant and the victim, the degree of intellectual disability of the victim, the circumstances and methods of the crime, etc., the nature of the crime and the crime are very heavy.

The victim seems to have suffered considerable sexual humiliation and mental suffering due to the defendant's crime, and the victim is punished for the defendant.

However, the Defendant, as a person with a disability of grade 5, has been living in a residential facility such as a disabled person and a homeless person since September 2016.

The defendant is sentenced to a fine for violating the Automobile Management Act around 200.