beta
Text
1. Defendant B, C, D, G, H, I, J, K, K, L, P, P, Q, R, Defendant (Appointed Party) E, F, X, X,Y, Z, AB, AC, AC, AD, and AD.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a corporation established by consisting of AF pursuant to Article 41 of the AF Act (hereinafter “Plaintiff Association”). The Defendants are members of the Plaintiff Association.
B. In the 10th presidential election held on October 6, 2008 by the Plaintiff Association, AG was elected as the president. However, in the lawsuit to nullify the election of the chairman of the Seoul Central District Court 2009Gahap16259, which was raised by some members of the Plaintiff Association, the above court sentenced the Seoul Central District Court to confirm that the election of AG is invalidated. The above judgment was finalized on October 28, 2010 after the appellate court and the final appeal.
C. Accordingly, the Plaintiff Association’s president’s position was vacant, and the board of directors held on November 11, 2010 (the board of directors held on November 11, 201) appointed AH, who was the vice president of the Plaintiff Association, as the president acting for the president, continued to hold the Plaintiff Association’s office while occupying the Plaintiff Association’s building.
After all, the 84 representative of the Plaintiff Association supporting Defendant B, which was called by Defendant D on January 11, 201, decided that AH, the acting president, and Defendant B, the 101 representative general meeting of the 101 representative meeting convened by Defendant D, who was not authorized to convene a meeting, shall be non-Confidence and elected as the extraordinary meeting.
E. At around 16:30 on the same day, more than 150 persons, including Defendant B and the officers and employees of the Plaintiff Association supporting them, were found in the Plaintiff Association’s building, cutting off the entrance entrance of the first floor of the outdoor parking lot, and cut off the automatic entrance of the first floor of the first floor, and damaged the Plaintiff Association’s property totaling KRW 12,874,00,000 by means of the number of pages, such as the number of copies as indicated in the attached sheet of damages in the attached sheet.
hereinafter referred to as "the case."