1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the office staff of the B University C Hospital affiliated with the school juristic person (hereinafter “BA”) and D is the director of the Medical Center for B University, the deputy director of the C University Hospital for B University, and the director of the F Medical Center for B University.

B. F was arrested on July 9, 2007 due to personal corruption, such as accepting money and valuables in exchange for illegal solicitation from G in relation to the business of the C Hospital funeral hall.

C. On February 12, 2009, the Plaintiff: (a) on July 16, 2007, the executives and employees of the Institute of Medical Services, D et al. submitted to the Office of the Government Public Prosecutor of the Office of Government through an anonymous national questioning that the Plaintiff committed an occupational breach of trust by paying the cost of attorney-at-law appointment for personal use of F from the public funds of the Institute of Medical Services; and (b) thus, (c)

(hereinafter referred to as “D, etc. breach of trust” in general referring to complaints or complaints filed against D, etc.

On June 11, 2009, the prosecutor in charge of the above internal investigation case (No. 2009 internal investigation office of the government prosecutor's office of the government prosecutor's office of the branch of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the medical center of the department of the medical center of the department of the medical center of the above medical center of Korea recognized the suspicion that the officer of the department

E. On August 31, 2009, the Plaintiff filed a petition with the Office of Government Prosecutor's Office of Government on the Do, E, and H again, and the said Office of Public Prosecutor's Office accepted it as a petition case (No. 488), and the Prosecutor in charge of the above case was ordered to close the public inspection on the ground that the case of occupational breach of trust was investigated by the Office of Government Prosecutor's Office No. 2009 type No. 33354, Jul. 16, 2007, and July 30, 2007, the case of occupational breach of trust was investigated by the Office of Government Prosecutor's Office No. 2009 type No. 33354, Jun. 26, 2009, and it

F. Accordingly, on March 3, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an appeal with the District Public Prosecutor’s Office.