Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant served as the Director of D University Medical Center from February 1, 2009 to March 25, 2010, and the victim E served as the Director of D Institute Medical Center from July 23, 2009 to August 18, 2010.

1. On March 11, 2010, from around 16:00 to 18:00 of the same day, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that, among the 10 teaching staff members of the Medical Center of Daegu-gu D University, the Defendant raised a complaint on the grounds that the victim interferes with the management of the Medical Center through the management diagnosis of the D Medical Center, and that, “the victim’s education, research, etc. of the faculty members are neglected, the victim would give rise to the reduction of the medical doctors to their revenues, and the victim’s income or many teaching staff members who want to go to the F Hospital is encouraging the division of D Institute by speaking the employees that the victim would have to go to the Medical Center.”

However, in fact, the victim did not say that the school juristic person Dental Foundation's normalization was given to the executive director system, and the head of the planning and coordination office was entrusted with the management diagnosis of the affiliated organization for the normal operation of the corporation, and that there was no such fact as mentioned above that the victim would reduce the intention to import, or that there was little revenue, or that the professor of the will will will be sent to the F Hospital.

2. On March 1, 2010, the Defendant, at the early police station Daegu, sent the same printed matter as the remarks set forth in the said paragraph to the head of the Daegu City Mayor and the head of the Dong-gu Northbuk-gu National Assembly HH’s Dong Dong-gu Council member H, Daegu, to the assistant officer J, K of the daily newspaper reporter, and the Korea Economic Interrogation L, etc.

Thus, the defendant generally refers to the false fact, and distributed a document containing false facts, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, M, N, andO;

1. Statement by the prosecution concerning P;

1. I’s written confirmation, daily confirmation of the K Newspaper reporter, Q. corporate Secretariat.