Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a BMW car.
On January 25, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on January 25, 2016, and led the three-lane road in front of the king City to the water-for-sports park on the side of the water-for-child elementary school.
On the other hand, the signal lights and crosswalks are installed at the front door, so it was confirmed whether a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce the speed and to see well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the person, and to drive safely according to the traffic signal.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the vehicle driving by the Defendant, who opened the right side of the victim D(89 years old, south) on the right side of the crosswalk in the direction of proceeding, by negligence, even though the vehicle driving signal is changed from green to yellow signal.
The Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a fluoral aggregate that requires approximately six weeks of treatment, due to such occupational negligence.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Photographs of video materials;
1. Photographs of an accident vehicle;
1. A medical certificate [The meaning of yellow light under Article 6 and attached Table 2 of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act (amended by April 30, 2011) provides that "motor vehicles and horses shall stop immediately before or after a stop line exists or crosswalks exist, and shall stop immediately when a vehicle and horses have entered the intersection even some of the motor vehicles and horses at the intersection, and shall stop the vehicle, in principle, if a yellow light has already been set off before the intersection enters the intersection."
Defendant
According to images taken by black boxes in the vehicle, it is recognized that the Defendant had already been shot lights before entering the crosswalk of this case, and at the time when it can be presumed by the above images.