The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. A favorable circumstance is that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected in depth the mistake.

However, it is disadvantageous that the defendant damaged the window of a parked vehicle with a tool prepared in advance and committed many crimes throughout the country throughout a considerable period of time due to the theft of money and valuables, there was a record of punishment for larceny in 198, 2006, 2008 and 2014, and in particular, there is a high possibility of repeatedly committing the same crime without being aware of it during the repeated period, and there is no effort to recover the victims from damage until the trial of the case.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and pleadings, the lower court’s punishment is deemed unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.