A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[B] On February 14, 2019, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as larceny in Daegu District Court and racing support. However, on March 21, 2019, at around 03:40, the Defendant was issued with a summary order of KRW 2 million, but was several times due to a failure to pay the said fine, and on March 21, 2019, at around 03:40, the Defendant’s land category as the suspect of D’s key larceny case (hereinafter referred to as “the instant larceny case”), which occurred at the C convenience store located in North-gu, North Korean Port Office B (hereinafter referred to as “the instant larceny case”), was subject to a disposition for the said larceny case on the same day

was a person who had been a person.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 04:20 on March 21, 2019, the Defendant in violation of the Resident Registration Act stated the Defendant’s pro-friendly H resident registration number (I) in order to conceal the fact that he/she was on the part of his/her receipt of a request to verify the identity of the thief in FF E in North Korea-Gu, North Korea-Si, North Korea-Si, and in order to conceal the fact that he/she was on the part of his/her receipt

Accordingly, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

2. The accused of forging a private document or uttering of a falsified investigative document shall be accompanied by a police box of the Posi Police Station located in 105-5, 105-5, both G and G, at the date and time, at the place specified in paragraph (1), and at the location specified in paragraph (1), for voluntary movement from the above G.

E. As H, I knew that he was requested by police officers to accompany and that he was entitled to refuse to accompany at any time, and that he was entitled to leave the place of accompanying at any time. I stated H’s name in the letter of voluntary behavior, which is viewed as the letter of voluntary behavior, stating “I confirm that I was accompanied by voluntary will. I confirmed that I was accompanied by the voluntary will,” and h’s name was stated in the letter of voluntary behavior, and h’s name was presented to the above G as if the letter of voluntary behavior, as above, was duly formed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a written consent in the name of H, which is a private document related to a certificate of fact, and forged private document.