beta
Text
1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] On November 9, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of five years for a crime of fraud in the establishment of the Changwon District Court Branch for a three-year period of imprisonment, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 17, 2016.
Defendant
B On May 18, 2012, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced eight months of imprisonment for fraud, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 12, 2012.
Defendant
C On September 1, 2016, the Daegu District Court rendered a sentence of one year and eight months of imprisonment for fraud in the Western Branch of the Daegu District Court on September 1, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 20, 2017.
[2] Defendant B: (a) was able to introduce Defendant C and A, a person who is engaged in the large-scale corporate bonds business in Busan, to the victim D; and (b) was able to engage in the large corporate bonds business in Busan, despite the absence of any particular funds; and (c) the Defendant A conspired to obtain the interest or commission on the loan to the victim by forging or altering the balance of deposit, etc. while driving the bonds company, and thereby acquiring a large amount of funds.
1. Alteration of private documents and the uttering of private documents;
A. On March 31, 2010, Defendant B exercised the altered E 8.9 billion won balance certificate (all of the Defendants) at the mutual infinite coffee shop in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul. On February 17, 2010, Defendant A issued to Defendant A the victim a certificate of deposit balance in the amount of KRW 8,900,000, written by altering the deposit balance in the amount of KRW 1,000 in the name of Defendant A issued by Defendant A in Busan, using the Stool shop program, and exercised it.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to use private documents on the rights and obligations altered.
B. On April 7, 2010, Defendant B requested Defendant C to alter a certificate of deposit balance of 26 billion won with the U.S. F Depository 26 billion won and its exercise (Defendant B and C) on April 4, 2010, and Defendant C requested Defendant C to alter a certificate of deposit balance of 26 billion won which would be presented to the victim.