A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 18, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court on July 30, 2009 and the sentence became final and conclusive on July 30, 2009.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around March 9, 2009, the Defendant acquired the right of implementation of hotel and its appurtenant facilities to the victim F, the executive director of the 7th floor of the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Cbuilding, from (ju) the (ju) E), to the victim F, the executive director of the 2nd executive director, at the (ju) G day in the north-gu G at the port. In order to carry out the construction of the new building, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the existing building should be removed, and that the removal of the building would change the 20 million won to the (ju) E to the subcontract.”

However, the fact is that the Defendant was unable to take over the right to implement the Newly constructed construction from the management of the (State) box, and there was no possibility of taking over the right to implement the Newly constructed construction due to the lack of money, so even if the Defendant received money from the victim, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to give a subcontract for the removal of the Newly constructed construction.

Around March 9, 2009, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 20 million from the victim to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant, around March 9, 2009.

2. Around March 24, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “Around March 24, 2009, the Defendant phoneed the victim F with the victim F and was urgently required money in relation to the construction of the G G Gwon hotel and ancillary facilities in the north-gu, North Korea at Port. The new construction may be carried out immediately. The payment of money may be made at the commencement of the construction.”

However, as stated in Paragraph 1 above, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to subcontract the removal work to (E). The Defendant did not have any specific property at the time and did not have any intent or ability to repay the removal even if he borrowed money from the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 30 million from the victim to the account in the name of D around March 24, 2009.

3...