A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around the end of April 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D through C at the second floor near the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Yeongdeungpopoporo Station, stating that “F would have been awarded the construction of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-building Building Hall.” The Defendant borrowed KRW 50 million at the cost of the deposit for the deposit of the deposit of the Seoul office and the cost of purchasing the office supplies, which reduces the subcontracting of the said new construction works. The Defendant would receive advance payment from the Committee for the Development of Cheongpo Office Profit-Making Business, a contractor, and complete payment until July 30, 2012.”

However, because F did not receive the said new construction from the Cheongju Profit-Making Project Development Committee, the suspect did not have the intent or ability to subcontract the said new construction works and the removal works, and even if receiving the money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay the money to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 50 million from the victim to the bank account in the name of C around May 15, 2012.

2. On May 2012, the Defendant forged private documents without the consent of “H and F representative director I” at the Defendant’s residence of the Seoul Southern-gu G building 202, Seoul, and without the consent of “H and F representative director I”, the title “the construction contract” in the name of “the construction contract” by the computer, “Seoul, the Seocho-gu, Seoul, the construction of the building J, the construction cost,” the “construction cost” in the “Seoul, the construction cost, April 5, 2012,” the scheduled date of commencement of the construction,” the contractor’s “the Chairman of the Committee on the Development of Cheongd Private Infrastructure,” the recipient’s “the representative director I of the Cheongd Co., Ltd.,” and affixed the H’s seal created at will by printing it out and sealing it.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged one copy of the construction agreement contract in the name of H and F representative director of the H and limited company, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

3. The defendant shall display a falsified investigation document.