(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.09.25 2019고단1690

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.09.25 2019고단1690

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On May 10, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor on the following grounds: (a) the crime of attack, attempted assault, fraud, larceny, property damage, Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, (b) the crime of a public official qualification, (c) the crime of an intrusion on residence, (d) the crime of an intrusion on purpose, and (e) the crime of an intrusion on purpose, and (e) the execution of the sentence was completed on January 5, 2019.

【Criminal Facts】

"2019 Highest 1690"

1. Interference with business;

A. From around 13:55 on July 5, 2019 to 14:10 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) committed a dispute with the customer who was taking meals at the Sungnam-gu B building, and the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C in the first floor; (b) and (c) caused the disturbance to interfere with the operation of the restaurant by the victim by force, such as having other customers who had been playing meals while avoiding the disturbance leave.

B. From around 08:15 on July 9, 2019 to 08:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) at the “G convenience store operated by the Victim F in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si; (b) on the grounds that the Defendant sought the convenience store and reported the Defendant to the police; (c) sought complaints from the Defendant on the grounds that his employees reported the Defendant to the police; and (d) made the victim’s desire to talk, and (e) interfere with the Defendant’s operation of convenience store by obstructing the convenience store by force, such as: (a) the Defendant’s attempt to restrain the Defendant from entering the convenience store; (b) whether the Defendant was “the victim’s attempt to restrain the Defendant from entering the convenience store; and (c) the victim’s attempt to stop him from entering the convenience store at the entrance of the convenience store.”

C. The Defendant from around 23:50 on July 11, 2019

7. 12. Between 00:00 and 2.

In the same place as the above victim F intended to purchase galm and tobacco from the victim F, but the above B.

The victim's convenience store is the victim's match due to the same damage as the paragraph.

참조조문

-여신전문금융업법

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2015.07.07 2015고정1212

-부산지방법원 2016.12.15 2016고정3716

-서울북부지방법원 2016.12.15 2016고단4337

-부산지방법원 2015.04.17 2014고단9849

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.11.05 2019고단2361