logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2019.07.16 2019고단864
문화재보호법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Any person who intends to change the current state of a Do-designated cultural heritage or engage in any act that may affect the preservation thereof, such as alteration of the current state without permission, shall obtain permission from the competent

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without obtaining permission from the competent authority, stated the facts charged in the indictment of Gyeonggi-do-designated cultural heritage designated by the State-designated cultural heritage around January 2017 as “State-designated cultural heritage” but seems to be erroneous

A single-story building D with approximately 99-115 square meters, which is located within the preservation area, designated for the protection of the historical and cultural environment of Do, B, etc., was newly constructed, and (2) around November 2017, a building that is likely to interfere with the landscape of Do-designated cultural heritage was installed on two occasions, such as constructing a single-story warehouse building with approximately 23 square meters in total in the same place.

2. On May 4, 2017, the Defendant, including violation of administrative orders, stated the facts charged in the indictment as “as of May 14, 2017,” but appears to be a clerical error.

Around August 21, 2017, around November 8, 2017, and around May 28, 2018, the above orders were violated without justifiable grounds even though they were ordered to suspend and reinstate the above actions four times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Relevant provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 99 (1), 74 (2), 35 (1) 2 of the Cultural Heritage Protection Act (unauthorized alteration of current state, etc.), Articles 100 subparagraph 1, 74 (2), and 42 (1) 4 of the Cultural Heritage Protection Act (violation of administrative orders, etc.), the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow