1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,109,300 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from October 30, 2015 to November 9, 2017.

1. The portion claiming the unpaid gold production price

A. On December 1, 2012, 1X8 6, X16 2,00, 200 gold-type production 33,00,000 won from November 1, 2014 to March 18, 2015, 30,000 won-type production 33,00,000 won-type production 30,000 won-type production 33,00,000 won-type 30,000 won-type 40,00 won-type 40,00 won-type 40,00 won-type 1,80,00 won-type 40,00 won-type 40,00 won-type 9,00 won-type 40,00 won-type 10,000 won-type 10,000 won-type 10,000 won-type 14,2015.

B. Defendant’s assertion 1) does not conflict with the details of transactions alleged by the Plaintiff. However, in addition to KRW 118,80,000 for the goods that the Plaintiff claimed, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff KRW 1,60,000 on May 21, 2012, and the Defendant on behalf of the Plaintiff paid KRW 3,571,460 on October 22, 2013, the above amount should also be deducted. 2) Furthermore, the Defendant paid KRW 11,314,00 for the repair of the goods that the Plaintiff supplied to the Defendant due to defective defects in the 1x8 6 bit gold type that the Plaintiff supplied to the Defendant, thereby offsetting the Plaintiff’s claim for compensation for damages.

C. It is insufficient to acknowledge that the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,600,000 in addition to the amount paid by the Plaintiff solely based on the above evidence because the statement of No. 10-4 of the evidence No. 10 alone was insufficient to find out who was the recipient of KRW 1,600,000, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

In addition, according to the entry of No. 5-3 of the evidence No. 5-3.