logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2019.11.28 2019고단1321
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In using and managing the means of access, no person shall borrow or lend a means of access, or keep, deliver or distribute a means of access, knowing that the means of access is to be used for a crime or to be used for a crime.

Nevertheless, the Defendant called from a name-free person who assumes the Defendant’s personnel of the lending company to make the transaction details of the deposit and withdrawal using the e-mail card. If sending the e-mail card, it is possible to borrow a loan. The Defendant’s credit will keep the results of the transaction of the deposit and withdrawal. Although the Defendant was unable to obtain a loan, the Defendant created a false transaction performance and received a so-called “illegal working loan,” which was obtained a loan by deceiving the lending company by raising the credit rating by raising a false credit rating, and around March 19, 2019, the Defendant sent Kwikkset service article who sent one e-mail card connected to the B partnership account (C) in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant at the e-mail (hereinafter referred to as the “Skset service”).

Accordingly, the Defendant lent the means of access knowing that it will be used for crime purposes or crime.

No person of "2019 Highest 1792" shall intermediate a third party's communications through telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator or provide such services for a third party's communications.

Nevertheless, around February 2019, the Defendant reported the phrase “30,000 won” on the Internet E, and consented to the proposal that “30,000 won per chip will be paid by opening it to the greatest extent possible if only an identification card is available.” On February 20, 2019, the Defendant sent a photograph of the Defendant’s identification card, a non-resident’s non-resident’s non-resident identification card, a written non-face-to-face-to-face visit, and a cell phone in the name of the Defendant on February 20, 2019.

arrow