1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The title of the invention of this case (Evidence A2) 1: C2) filing date/registration date/registration number: D/E/F3; Defendant 4); on the other hand, the claims 1 and 4 of the patented invention of this case became final and conclusive by the Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board on June 12, 2014, as the invalidation trial ruling rendered on the invalidation of the patented invention of this case became final and conclusive on June 12, 2014, but the claims 1 were cited in the claims 3.

【The number indicated in the overall title (3) of the instant patent invention means the number indicated in the main drawing sign of the instant patent invention.

The patented invention of this case and the comparable inventions shall be indicated in the same manner as in both the instant patented invention and the comparable inventions. In the case of both the instant patented invention and the instant comparable inventions, the main frame (2) with a slope surface (4) and the main frame (2) (hereinafter “Composition 1”), connected from the day on the main frame (2) to the opening border (11), and connected to the front frame (8) on the lower side to the front frame (10) and the opening press (7) connected to the cell line (9) fixed on the main frame (2) to the front line (hereinafter “Composition 2 and 4”), 【 Claim 2 and 4’ omitted 【 Claim 3’ in Paragraph 1 of Article 3, the opening and closing press (7), the location on the opposite side of the main frame (5) : the main characteristics of the construction 3’s main structure and drawings 4’s main characteristics are as follows:

B. The invention subject to confirmation (amended on May 12, 2015, and attached Form 2) concerns the Plaintiff’s specific “G” in relation to the invention subject to confirmation (attached Form 2), and the description and drawings thereof are as shown in attached Form 2.

C. Among the cited inventions, the cited inventions 2 and 3 were not submitted at the trial stage of the instant case, and only submitted in the instant lawsuit.

1) Invention 1 (A-4 comparable inventions 1) is compared to the device described in the registered Utility Model Gazette, not to the invention, or to the challenged invention.