beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.
Seized evidence 3 through 8 and 34 shall be confiscated, respectively.
The defendant.
Reasons
Criminal facts
[2013 Highest 1026] [Basic Facts] Around August 2012, at a place where it is impossible to know the organization of the telephone financial fraud group, which is called a crime of prompt phishing, the Defendant conspiredd to commit fraud by obtaining a proposal from the head of G company where the name of the organization of the telephone financial fraud group, which is called a crime of prompt phishing, cannot be known. “I want to operate the call center office in China, and use the word phishing method by taking advantage of the name of the commission, etc. while operating the call center office in China. In Korea, there is a need for a person to withdraw the money obtained through the above, and it is necessary for the person to withdraw the money in Korea to find out the passbook, check card, etc. necessary for the withdrawal, and if you take the role of withdrawing cash, it will give 5% of the amount of the money to be withdrawn in return, thereby doing so.”
【Criminal Facts】
1. Computer, etc. fraud;
A. On March 5, 2013, the telephone financial fraud group, such as the president, etc., obtained financial transaction information, such as the account number, password, and security card number in the name of the victim from the victim, and transferred funds acquired from the victim’s account to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of H and the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of I in the name of the so-called large-called large-type large-type one,1730,000 won over ten times, by making phone calls to the victim D to the effect that “it is necessary to confirm the details of the passbook transaction, and input the bank account number, password, and password, etc. on the Internet website in the inside the inside the country”.
As above, the Defendant was notified of the fact that the damage fund was deposited by the above G G company head from 11:55 to 13:03 of the same day, and the Defendant was in possession of the aforementioned H and I.