A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 18:00 on May 24, 2014, the Defendant driven a e-car with alcohol level of 0.23% alcohol level at around 18:50 on the same day at around 18:50 from the 107 Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean, which was under the influence of alcohol level of approximately 0.223% at the 18.5 Mean Mean Mean

2. The facts charged in the obstruction of performance of official duties include that the defendant Ga and H "Woo Doz............. Dokkkkkkk for the balk for the balk for the balk for the balk for the business, and collapse. However, it is not deemed that the prosecutor separately charged with the defendant's intimidation and intimidation. The part corresponding to the obstruction of performance of official duties (the part of violence and intimidation against the public official performing official duties) among the facts charged is organized as follows, and acknowledged the facts charged.

At around 18:50 on May 24, 2014, the Defendant voluntarily operated as the F Zone of the Dacheon Police Station for the measurement of drinking by the police officer G, G, and police officer H, who was under the influence of alcohol while divingd at the E-high driver's seat in the 320 underground parking lot owned by the Defendant, after receiving a report that the Defendant was under the influence of drinking.

On May 24, 2014, at around 19:05, the Defendant: (a) received a demand from G to respond to the measurement of alcohol from the above F District; (b) refused H to take a video image from side to respond to the measurement of alcohol; and (c) assaulted police officers who perform their duties, such as: (a) threatening a police officer who takes charge of duties, such as “the hacker, the hacker hacker, if the hacker is marked by the hacker; and (b) “the hacker, if the hacker’s right to the hack?” and “the hacker’s hack, if the hacker’s right to the hack?”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Application of the police statement law to H 1.