A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On September 8, 2017, at around 05:25, the Defendant, at the site of the D1st floor located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and around 05:25 on September 8, 2017, filed a dispute with the victim B(55) and on the top of the goods, and brought the victim’s shoulder one time due to the decline, which is a dangerous object, on the ground that the said logistics center corridor, continuously carried the victim’s flaps, and caused the victim to go beyond the floor, thereby making the victim go beyond approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Each statement of the defendant and B;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. Photographs and damaged photograph of the case;

1. An injury diagnosis certificate (B);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (with respect to the statements of a wooden shot person, the confirmation of on-site CCTV and the alteration of the name of a crime due to the submission of a written diagnosis of

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of special injury) concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. According to the legal principles stated in Articles 32(1)3 and 25(3)3 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits Rejecting Application for Compensation Orders, etc., the sentencing guidelines for special injury crimes under Article 258-2(1) of the Criminal Act are not set with respect to the sentencing of sentencing on the grounds of sentencing of the victim’s submission of a written agreement (see Supreme Court Decision 201Do4194, June 10, 201).

The crime of this case was committed by the victim of the working team leader who is not good between the defendant and the victim of the work team leader, who is the delivery employee, ordered the defendant to work again, and the defendant was in danger of causing bodily injury by using violence, such as taking the defendant's back one time as a dangerous object, etc. In particular, the crime of this case was committed by using a mosium, and there was a risk of much more serious consequences.

In addition, the defendant.