Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

On May 15, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Northern District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 24, 2014.

1. Violence;

A. On December 26, 2013, the Defendant drinked at the package pent the C side in Busan City Shipping Daegu, Busan, on December 26, 2013, in or around the package of the vehicle in C, located in Busan, Daegu, and used to drink at the side.

D(23 세 )에게 어묵 국물이 튄 것에 대해 욕설을 하던 중, 옆에 있던 피해자 E(47 세) 가 듣고 “ 아무리 어린이라도 나이가 들었는데 그러시냐

‘A defect in interference,’ and a complaint against this, “n't interfere with the conduct of the

“In drinking, the victim assaulted the victim at one time at the left-hand face of the victim.”

2. Interference with performing public duties;

A. On December 26, 2013, at the same place around 00:20 on the same day, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender under suspicion of assault against E, and went ahead of the G District of the Maritime Police Station G District located in Busan Shipping Team on the same day on the same day, but it was difficult to avoid disturbance, such as: (a) the Defendant committed a disturbance by putting the Defendant on the floor on the lower part of the earth parking lot located adjacent to the earth, in order not to enter the said area as a complaint.

Therefore, there was a defect that the Ra et al. tried to use the lock gear, and the defendant took one-time face of the left-hand side of the Ha, E-Ma-Ma, and assaulted the slopeJ, who was removed from the next side, of drinking, by drinking, drinking, fishing, bridge, neck, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E, H, J, and K;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) (the selection of each fine);

1. Article 37 of the Criminal Act for the treatment of concurrent crimes: Provided, That Article 39 (1) shall apply;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes.