1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 13, 2008, the Plaintiff, a police officer of the Jung-gu Government Police Station B patrol, was discharged from the Plaintiff’s office using a bicycle and was faced with shock on a passenger car (hereinafter “instant accident”), and thereafter, the Plaintiff was given medical treatment for total 978 days upon obtaining from the Defendant for medical treatment for official duties, such as “the fluoral and fluorites on the outer side of the fluorite, the fluorite, the fluoral, the fluoral and fluorite, the fluorite, the fluoral and the outer side of the fluorite, the fluorite, the fluoral and the fluorite, the right-hand fluoral fluor, the right-hand fluort damage, and the fluorial stress disorder.”

B. The Plaintiff filed an application for approval of additional medical care with respect to knee-free symptoms, chronic chronic dyslexia, damage, etc. (hereinafter “instant injury”). However, around January 12, 2012, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval of additional medical care with respect to certain injury and disease, such as the instant injury and disease, on the ground that “the instant injury and disease have no causal relation with official duties or can be treated under another approved injury and disease” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. The Plaintiff is seeking the revocation of only part of the instant injury and disease among the instant disposition.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 7, 34 evidence, Eul 1, 2, 5, 6 evidence (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that causation between the instant accident and the instant injury and disease is recognized.

The plaintiff is currently receiving medical treatment for the injury and disease of this case, and the effects of the improvement of the US butama are shown, so the approval of additional medical care for the injury and disease of this case is required.

(b) The details of the relevant statutes are as shown in the attached statutes.

(c) Medical opinion 1) Medical opinion 1. Medical certificate of Dec. 29, 2011 (Seoul large Hospital Presumption): chronic dyslexic pain, damage to the left-hand body, and damage to the upper-hand body.