A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On December 31, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Daejeon District Court's red support, etc., and the said judgment was finalized on January 8, 2015.

The defendant committed the following crimes in the process of pursuing with the victim as a person who was in a relationship with the victim D (In this case, 44 years old).

1. Damage to property;

A. On July 21, 2014, at around 20:00, the Defendant destroyed the Victim’s residence in Asia-si E, and the Defendant, after having a horse dispute with the victim, was delivered food to drink, but was refused, thereby damaging the Defendant’s price at which the Victim’s market price was planned to be equivalent to KRW 60,000,000, and the machine cup’s price at KRW 3,000, was loaded on the wall.

B. On July 24, 2014, at around 12:00, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s residence in a manner that the victim, upon receipt of a request for indecent act from a new Do, destroyed the victim’s equipment at the entrance where the victim was inside the entrance of the defect where he/she tried to get his/her house by leaving the equipment necessary, by damaging the locking floor, which is an intangible product worth KRW 130,00,000, in his/her hand.

C. On July 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 14:25, at the residence of the above victim; and (b) above.

The victim called the victim from the outing for the reason of Paragraph 1 and damaged the king, which is a non-speed product in an amount equivalent to KRW 50,00,00, in the market price owned by the victim who was in the front line of the table.

2. Around August 8, 2014, the Defendant attempted to intrude upon his/her residence on or before the victim’s residence, and the victim abusedd by the Defendant in the door of the remaining residence where the victim left the Defendant, was forced to enter the locked and the victim’s residence, and was scambling, and was scambling the front door, but the victim did not bring about his/her attempted crime at the wind of 112 report.

3. The Defendant who intrudes upon his/her residence on August 9, 2014, as mentioned in the foregoing paragraph (2), around 00:00.