beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 136,974,553 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 6% from September 6, 2016 to February 2, 2018 and the next day.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. A. Around October 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a construction contract (hereinafter “instant construction contract”) with the Defendant to supply and demand a studio-self-supporting retaining wall (including value added tax) construction cost of KRW 225,500,000 (including waste-added tax) during the relocation project and the period from August 8, 2016 to September 7, 2016 (hereinafter “instant construction contract”) (main construction work contents were 28 and the Defendant, by oral agreement, set up 28 parts other than 28 air units under this contract. The Plaintiff and the Defendant made the excavation hole and inserted the H file into the excavated hole, added concrete to the lower part, set up soil plates, cut off the protruding file parts, etc., and performed the instant construction work at the construction site to carry out the instant construction work, thereby making it possible for the Plaintiff to carry out the instant work at the construction site.
In addition, one astronomical engineer, one assistant engineer, and two other workers have been posted in the process of the process of the process of the process of the operation of the non-party D as the managing officer.
Accordingly, the construction work has been completed on or around September 5, 2016, and the defendant paid 80,646,720 won to the plaintiff among the construction work price in this case, but the remaining 142,789,987 won has not been paid, or there is no dispute between the parties, or by the testimony of Gap and witness D, and there is no counter-proof.
B. According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the remaining amount of 142,789,987 won of the construction of this case and damages for delay, unless there are special circumstances.
2. Judgment as to the defendant's assertion of deduction
A. The Defendant asserted 1. The construction of the instant case can be input only of the equipment approved by E, the ordering place, and the Plaintiff needs to install a H file with only two tents, compacts, cansings, etc. at the construction site of the instant case.