logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2014.04.17 2013가합12120
구상금
Text

1. The Defendant: 80,000,000 won for the Federation of the Korean Freight Trucking Services, and 36,000,000 won for the Plaintiff A, respectively.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. As a federation engaged in mutual aid activities, such as automobile mutual aid, the Plaintiff Trucking Services Federation (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff Federation”) concluded a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement between the Youngjin Transportation Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “YM”) and the Plaintiff Jining Transport Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “SMM”) with respect to the Hyundai 15 tons car trucks owned by Youngjin Transportation Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the instant car truck”), with respect to the type of air transport, the type of security, and the period of the mutual aid agreement from June 17, 2012 to June 1, 2013.

Plaintiff

A is a land owner and a driver of a car model who enter the instant car truck into a field-based transportation.

B. On September 201, the Defendant concluded a construction contract with GSST Co., Ltd. with respect to “C Corporation” during the construction period from October 1, 2011 to January 31, 2013 (hereinafter “instant construction contract”) and implemented the construction project.

The Defendant entered into a contract of commercial loading and unloading of piping materials necessary for the instant construction with the Central Cake Co., Ltd., and the instant car truck operated by Plaintiff A was put into the construction site as the main line of the Central Cakes Co., Ltd.

C. At around 15:20 on January 18, 2013, Plaintiff A: (a) performed the work of unloading steel materials loaded on the instant car truck in the vicinity of the E plant located in F, Inc., in order to install pipes (hereinafter “the instant car”). At the construction site of the Defendant, F, a working group at the construction site, was engaged in the work of cutting off and unloading steel materials from the instant steel materials to the point of loading and unloading; and (b) the Defendant, a working group at the construction site, was engaged in the work of cutting off the steel materials to the point of loading and unloading; (c) in close vicinity to the transmission line along which the current current of 154,000 V flows, the safety of the boom boom of C, which became close to the high voltage line, thereby blocking the opening and closing (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

In this case.

arrow