The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

When the Defendant received a restaurant from the victim, the Defendant was promised that he will not operate the restaurant in the vicinity, and thereafter, the victim committed an illegal act, such as entering into the above agreement and opening the restaurant in the vicinity, and the Defendant was unable to pay the tuitions due to the above illegal act to the victim, and the victim also recognized it, and thus, the Defendant cannot be deemed to have committed a crime of breach of trust.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty is erroneous by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 알 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 피고인은 경찰에서 “피해자로부터 식당을 인수하면서 동종 영업을 하지 않는다는 각서를 써달라고 했는데 써주지 않았고, 피해자가 갑자기 자신이 사용하는 전화를 정지시켰으며, 말 한마디 없이 인근에 식당을 낸 것이 너무 괘씸해서 계금을 주지 않는 것이다.”고 진술하여 자신의 범행을 인정하는 취지의 진술을 하였을 뿐 아니라, 원심에서 이 사건 범행을 자백한 바 있는 점, ② 제출된 자료들만으로는 피해자의 피고인에 대한 불법행위가 있었다

In full view of the above facts, it is difficult to accept the Defendant’s assertion in view of the fact that there is an agreement between the victim and the Defendant to deduct the amount of damages caused by the tort as above and the amount that the Defendant should pay to the victim.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.