1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff and the Defendant had been legally married on October 7, 2008, but the Defendant filed a divorce lawsuit against the Plaintiff by the Gwangju Family Court 2010Ddan19397. On October 26, 2011, the Gwangju Family Court rendered a judgment of divorce on the ground that “the marriage between the Plaintiff and the Defendant has already disappeared and reached a situation where recovery is impossible,” and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of evidence No. 1, purport of the whole pleadings

2. 원고의 주장 원고는 광주 북구 C에서 미용실을 운영하고 있는데, 피고는 피고의 둘째 형수인 D의 남동생의 부인인 E와 부적절한 관계를 유지하면서, 2009년 초순경부터 현재까지 피고의 둘째 형수인 D, E 및 그 친척 일가 등과 공모하여 원고가 운영하는 미용실 주변에 다른 미용실을 개업하는 등으로 원고의 미용실 업무를 방해하였고, 밤이 되면 원고가 운영하는 미용실 2층의 당구장에서 쿵쾅거리며 뛰거나 미용실 1층의 양쪽 옆의 술집에서 일부러 시끄럽게 떠드는 등으로 소음을 유발시켜 원고를 괴롭혔다.

The plaintiff suffered mental pain due to the defendant's tort, and the defendant is obligated to pay 50,000,000 won and damages for delay as consolation money to the plaintiff.

3. The descriptions and videos of Gap evidence Nos. 2-1 through 4 (including each number) are not enough to recognize that the defendant committed a tort in collusion with D, E, and their relatives, such as obstructing the plaintiff's beauty room business and causing noise to the plaintiff, or that the plaintiff suffered mental suffering due to the defendant's tort, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

4. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.