1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. At around 17:00 on February 28, 2016, the Plaintiff moved to an emergency room of the D Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and was hospitalized on the same day after the diagnosis of the symptoms, etc. of the Heatitis.

B. On February 29, 2016, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as guard’s stone, and the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital discontinued the use of guard’s typium, which is an air-conditioning agents that the Plaintiff was ordinarily taking in order to perform an operation to remove guard’s stone.

C. On March 2, 2016, the Plaintiff received an operation to remove the absence from school at the Defendant Hospital.

On March 5, 2016, at around 23:20, the Plaintiff was aware of brain salute and transferred to E hospital around 00:07 on March 6, 2016 as a result of brain salute shooting, and the brain salute became the left-hand side due to brain salute.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 2, and 5, the result of the request for appraisal of medical records by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. (1) On March 5, 2016, the Plaintiff was found to have neglected the Plaintiff’s medical malpractice without any urgent action, and on March 5, 2016, the Plaintiff, at the Defendant Hospital Hospital Hospital Hospital Hospital Hospital Hospital’s hospital hospital hospital hospital, 10 to 20 minutes after the Plaintiff’s flasing of the Plaintiff’s flasing of the Plaintiff’s flasing of the flasing of the flasing of the flasing of the flasing of the flas. However, the Plaintiff neglected the Plaintiff’s flasing of the flasing of the flasing of the Plaintiff

First, with respect to whether the medical personnel at Defendant Hospital neglected the Plaintiff without taking any measure of 40 minutes after the Plaintiff lost consciousness as alleged in the Plaintiff’s above assertion, it is insufficient to recognize this only on the basis of each of the statements in the Health Team, Eul’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 5, and the result of this court’s request for the appraisal of medical records, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this differently

(2) The Plaintiff’s existence of negligence prohibiting the Plaintiff from taking over a long period of time after the surgery is conducted shall be determined by blood transfusion after the instant surgery.