1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

(a) order the buildings listed in the annex sheet;

B. Gold 1,700,000 and from August 1, 2018

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiffs share the buildings listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) between husband and wife in shares of 1/2.

B. On August 9, 2017, the Plaintiffs entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the instant building with a deposit of KRW 10,000,000, and a lease agreement with a monthly rent of KRW 24 months from September 1, 2017, and KRW 1,300,000 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”), and deliver the instant building to the Defendant, and the Defendant operates a restaurant up to the day from the instant building.

C. The Defendant paid only the first two-month rent, and delayed the payment of KRW 11,700,000 for nine-month rent by July 31, 2018.

On September 27, 2018, a duplicate of the complaint of this case stating the Plaintiff’s declaration of termination of the instant lease agreement reaches the Defendant.

[Reasons for Recognition] Nos. 1 and 2 does not dispute or it is evident for the period, each entry of evidence No. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. If the determination on the cause of the claim is based on the termination of the instant lease contract, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 1,700,000, which remains after deducting the above lease deposit from the above delayed rent, and KRW 1,300,000 per month from August 1, 2018 to the date of loss of ownership of the name city of the instant building or the Plaintiffs.

3. The plaintiff's request for the conclusion is reasonable.