Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On November 10, 2016, the Defendant received an investigation into a case involving bodily injury to C from the second underground floor of “B building” on the second underground floor of “B building,” and had a mind to resist C by reflecting it.

On November 2016, the Defendant used a computer at an office located near the main beach of the port, Dong-dong, Mapo-gu, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, and the Defendant submitted a false complaint to the public service center of the public service center of the port, port, and port, around November 10, 2016, despite that the Defendant did not have been abused by the Defendant C at the time of the occurrence of Mapo-si and Sin-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si.

As a result, the defendant made a false accusation for the purpose of having C receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by each prosecutor to the defendant, D, or C;

1. Statement made by the police against the defendant;

1. A complaint, a medical certificate, and a medical certificate;

1. One copy of the screen of a notice of the results of video appraisal, CCTV CDs (the 62 pages of investigation records), and a screen of a visual image improved in the chemical quality;

1. Investigative reports (Attachment to the protocol of interrogation of the relevant case), investigation reports (Attachment to the protocol of trial, etc.), investigation reports (Attachment to the record of interrogation of the relevant case), investigation reports (the results of trial in the first instance of the relevant case), investigation reports (the results of trial in the relevant case), investigation reports (the confirmation of the results of disposition in the A accusation case) [the accused and defense counsel did not have intention to

However, the above evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court and the circumstances revealed therefrom, namely, ① the Defendant asserted that C was the head at the time of the accusation and the initial accusation, but at the time of the accusation and the first accusation, C used to reproduce the video CCTV CDs to improve the chemical quality at an investigative agency, and thereafter C used it to put C in the back the body of the Defendant at his hand.

The arguments were reversed, and ② each prosecutor’s statement protocol, and the video images of CCTV images improved in the chemical quality of D and C.