logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2014.09.18 2014고단1076
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, by submitting false documents, received the name “work loan” from the Defendant’s mother, intended to purchase the NAS in the name of the Defendant’s mother, and paid 50,000 won in cash to the Defendant, who received a work loan introduced from C, and the name-free person offered to create B’s certificate of employment.

Accordingly, the Defendant issued 500,000 won to the person under whose name the person under whose name the person under whose name the person under whose name the person under whose name the person under whose name the person under whose name the person under whose name the person under whose name the person under whose name the person was named is named, was named, “Name B, resident registration number D, Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City E, Daegu Metropolitan City E, representative, H, category of civil engineering facilities business, 405 of the I building in the Daegu Metropolitan City where the place of business is located, office management department, position division, office division, office term of November 1, 2012 to May 15, 2012, and 2013 to certify that the person under whose name the person was enrolled in Korea on June 11, 2012 and entered the phrase “FH” and affixed a seal in the name of H created next to the phrase “FH”.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a certificate of employment in F, a private document related to a certificate of fact, for the purpose of uttering in collusion with a person who has lost his name.

2. On May 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) purchased a vehicle in the name of “K” office located in the first floor of the Seo-gu Seo-gu J building, Seo-gu; (b) submitted to the person in charge who is not aware of the forged name as prescribed in paragraph (1) as if he were duly constituted a forged F’s employment certificate under the name of F, as prescribed in paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the defendant exercised a false private document F's employment certificate on L in the name of F.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as referred to in paragraph (1), intends to provide a loan to the person in charge where the name, who is an employee of the victim Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. is unknown.

arrow