1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 5, 2015, the Plaintiffs’ mother-friendly deceased (D students; hereinafter “the deceased”) committed a work to assist the activities of E, who is the first-class visually impaired, in the emergency room of the Gangseo-hee Hospital, where the patients were hospitalized, around 76:0 a.m., and was hospitalized in the hospital at a heat-proof hospital after the outbreak. On the 21st of the same month, quarantine was taken on the 23th of the same month. While concentrated treatment was received after being transferred to the National Medical Center on the 24th of the same month, the closure has deteriorated, and died due to the Madar’s waste.

B. On September 17, 2015, the Plaintiffs filed an application with the Defendant for the lump-sum survivors’ compensation benefits and funeral expenses, and the Defendant recognized the death of the Deceased on duty under Article 62 of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, and paid the lump-sum survivors’ compensation benefits and funeral expenses based on KRW 51,746 on the ground that the average wage of the Deceased is less than the minimum compensation standard amount, as follows:

A - Plaintiff A: 33,634,90 won (=51,746 won x 1,300 days/2) - Plaintiff B: 33,634,90 won for a lump-sum payment with a 67,269,800 won for a lump-sum payment with a 67,269,80 won for a lump-sum payment with a 63,634,90 won for a funeral for a 2015 funeral expenses.

C. On June 29, 2016, Plaintiff B filed an application with the Defendant for correction of the average wage for the Deceased, but received the non-approval decision on July 5, 2016, and Plaintiff A filed the same application with the Defendant on July 8, 2016, but received the non-approval decision on July 11, 2016.

(hereinafter referred to as the "disposition of this case" in total). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, entry in Gap's 1 to 3, 6, 8 evidence, Eul's 1 to 3 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiffs asserted that the deceased worked at the F Self-Support Center for the Disabled in the A.M., and at the G Care Bath Center for the P.M., the average wages of the deceased should be divided by the total amount of wages of the above two agencies.