1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The following facts may be admitted, either as a matter of dispute between the parties or as a whole, by taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings as set out in Gap evidence 1 to 7 and Eul evidence 1 to 4 (including paper numbers):

The defendant company as a party is a corporation that has its head office in Overcheon-si, and operates the mass manufacturing and sales business, and the net F is a person who died of the acute heart marism on December 4, 2012 while entering the defendant company on January 3, 2012 and serving as the product MD team leader. The defendant A is the deceased's spouse, the plaintiff B, and C are the deceased's children.

B. On December 4, 2012, the Deceased’s death was around 07:47, and around December 4, 2012, at the subway zone located in the subway Dong-dong, Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, he was flicking, and was used in the future, and the 119 first responder, who was dispatched to the site, did cardiopulmonary resuscitation, but did not flick, died without birth. As a result of the autopsy conducted by the National Science Investigation Agency, the cause of the Deceased’s death was found to be acute flick.

C. On February 10, 2014, the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service filed an application with the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses, alleging that the acute border color, which is the cause of the deceased’s death, is an occupational disease. However, on February 10, 2014, the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service issued a non-approval of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the deceased’s acute border color. (2) Meanwhile, the Defendant paid the Plaintiffs KRW 30 million insurance money paid to the Plaintiffs under an organization injury insurance contract concluded between the Defendant and the Heung Fire, and separately paid KRW 20 million on the pretext of the deceased’s death.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Party’s assertion 1) The deceased’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is an excessive work prior to his/her death (in particular, from September 2012 to December 2012, 2012, the deceased’s frequent local business trip, sampling work, and delivery business trip.