logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.20 2016고단2638
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 8 months and fines of 5,000,000 won, Defendant B’s imprisonment of 8 months and fines of 5,00,000 won, and Defendant C.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and the Defendants, under the trade name of “F” in Seoul Gangnam-gu Office 827, 117, 1128, etc., Defendant A and B, employed by the business owner of a commercial sex trafficking business in the name of an employee C, G, H, etc. and employed by the business owner of a commercial sex trafficking business establishment (hereinafter “I”), work to guide the relevant heading office of an officetel in which women are waiting to engage in commercial sex acts by receiving money from the customers who find the above office in the name of a commercial sex acts.

On December 8, 2015, the Defendants received KRW 1.60,00 from the male guest J as a chemical agent from the said male guest J and let the said C do a sexual intercourse once.

Accordingly, Defendant A engaged in commercial sex acts in collusion with the above name in order to arrange commercial sex acts from September 16, 2015 to March 3, 2016, and Defendant B from October 26, 2015 to March 3, 2016.

2. Defendant C:

A. On October 29, 2015, the indictment is written “10.28.” However, according to the evidence, it is apparent that it is a clerical error in “10.29.” As such, the indictment is corrected and recognized. From around 22:10 to 22:128 of the officetels 1128 of the preceding paragraph, sexual intercourse is conducted by receiving KRW 150,000 from male customers K and having a sexual intercourse once with them;

B. On December 8, 2015, at the place before and after around 24:00, sexual intercourse was conducted by male customers by receiving KRW 1.60,00 won from the J as a chemical agent and providing sexual intercourse once.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. The respective legal statements of the defendant A and B;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the defendant A or B by the prosecution;

1. Some statements concerning G during the suspect examination protocol of the police officer;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer concerning C, J, K, H, and L;

1. Written statements;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Evidentiary photographs;

1. Field control photographs;

1. Domination photograph of the business establishment (Defendant C);

1. Defendant C’s legal statement

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect B by the prosecution;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the police officers in B, J, or K;

1. Evidentiary photographs (no more than 4788, 5210, 6034 investigation records of 2-18, 2016)

1. On-site control photographs;

arrow