Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 22:40 on the 29th day of Kim Young-gu, Jin-gu, Jin-gu, Kim Young-gu, the Defendant: (b) stopped the F mother-flaf vehicle in front of the Yan apartment apartment house located in Jin-gu, Jin-gu, Jin-gu; and (c) confirmed that “F mother-flaf vehicle is suspected of driving under drinking alcohol” was called after receiving a 112 report; (d) the police officer belonging to the G police box in the Busan Police Station; and (e) the victim, who was carrying the flaf on the flaf’s seat of the above flaf, was asked for drinking alcohol to take a alcohol test; and (e) the victim, who was making the flaf with the flaf, was forced to shock the damaged person to the vehicle, leading the victim to a flaf by taking approximately 2 weeks medical treatment for the victim.
Accordingly, the defendant, using a dangerous object, interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties of police officers, thereby causing injury to the victim who is a police officer.
2. On March 9, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act from the Changwon District Court on March 9, 2007, and a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act by the same court on June 7, 2010.
On December 29, 2017, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.141% among blood transfusion around 22:30 on December 29, 2017, the Defendant driven a FF-non-motor vehicle at the section of approximately 2.7 km in front of the dong ChangwonIC apartment apartment located in the summer-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City from the Jingu Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City), Jinwon-si parking lot of the Jingu Special Metropolitan City to the lower limit of 0.141%.
As a result, even though the Defendant was punished more than twice for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, he again driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made to H and I;
1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;
1. The date of the diagnosis of the victim I and the date of the first diagnosis of the victim I;