logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1986. 7. 22. 선고 85감도262 판결
[보호감호][집34(2)형,459;공1986.9.15.(784),1146]
Main Issues

Whether the crime of rape, the crime of injury, and the crime of intimidation, among the crimes of violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act, constitutes the same or similar crime as prescribed by the Social Protection Act.

Summary of Judgment

The crime of rape and the crime of injury or intimidation, which is the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, shall not be deemed to constitute the same or similar crime as provided in Article 6 (2) of the Social Protection Act.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 6 of Social Protection Act

Applicant for Custody

Applicant for Custody

upper and high-ranking persons

Prosecutor

Judgment of the lower court

Daegu High Court Decision 85No64 delivered on June 18, 1985

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

We examine the prosecutor's grounds of appeal.

The crime of rape and the crime of injury to a victim, which is the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, shall not be deemed to fall under the same or similar crime as provided in Article 6 (2) of the Social Protection Act. The court below's interpretation to the same purport has no errors of law by misapprehending the legal principles of the Social Protection Act. It is groundless.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Yoon Yoon-tae (Presiding Justice)

arrow