logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.10.31 2013고단4431
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 14, 2013, the Defendant did not take necessary measures to ensure that, while driving a Category B car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.110% on August 21, 2013, the Defendant, while driving at a speed of about 60 km for about a speed of about 60 km from the south Korean University at Joseon University at the south Korean University at the south Korean University at a three-lane speed from the south Korean University, the Defendant did not look at the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right of the vehicle of the Dmp car driven by the victim C while driving the Dmp car at a four-lane course by changing its course to a four-lane, while driving the Dmp car from the Defendant’s vehicle chief between the two parts of the Dmp car to damage the victim’s vehicle.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Minju Driving) from the date and time limit set forth in the foregoing 1.1. to the roads in front of the mountain water market in the Dong-dong, Gwangju-dong, Seoan-dong, Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-dong, to the roads in front of the military college of Seoan-dong, Gwangju-dong, with a blood alcohol content of about 0.110% under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Entry of the C-Preparation Statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statute to a traffic accident report (1) and a actual survey report and an actual survey report;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning the facts of crime, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act that choose the penalty, Articles 148 and 54 (2) 2 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (2) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of imprisonment for each sentence;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant committed the crime again even though he had been under the influence of drinking twice during the last four years, and there is no particular criminal record other than the one, there is no history of having been sentenced to imprisonment, and the defendant would not repeat the same crime again recognizing his mistake.

arrow