beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Criminal facts
1. Around 21:00 on January 25, 2015, the Defendant driven an I truck under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.147% of the blood alcohol concentration at approximately 20m from the 20m section to the road located at approximately 32-1:10 on the 32-1-lane from the Do located at the Do located at the 32-1-gil, Ansan-si, Ansan-si.
2. The Defendant committed an act of obstruction of performance of official duties by assaulting the Defendant at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and at the place specified in paragraph (1), that the police officer of the Ansan-gu Police Station, Police Station, Police Station, Police Station of the Ansan-gu, who called the Defendant to arrest a flagrant offender on charges of drinking, driving, etc., and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's partial statement [the defendant and his defense counsel are arrested the defendant in the act of committing an offense of obstruction of performance of official duties against the defendant's act of using violence against the illegal arrest of the defendant in the act of committing an offense of obstruction of official duties as long as the police officer's arrest of the defendant in the act of violence is not necessary. The following evidence reveals: (a) The police officer, upon receiving a report from the defendant that "A person has committed an assault" is called "A person who has committed an assault"; (b) the defendant at the time when he arrived at the place of the crime in the judgment in the judgment in the judgment in the judgment in the judgment in the case in the case in the case in the case in question, the defendant goes against L, and the defendant goes against the defendant's side and the L side; and (b) K has prevented the defendant and the L side (However, despite
When hearing the circumstances of the case in both sides, it was confirmed that the defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, and ③ K demanded the defendant to accompany the defendant to the earth in order to verify the accurate blood alcohol concentration level, but the defendant refused to do so, and K was punished by K, and K notified the defendant of the non-fluoral principle.