1. The Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff A, the amount of KRW 5,984,850, the Plaintiff B, and C, each of which was KRW 5,884,850; and (b) from April 5, 2017 to April 2017.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business name (1) Business name: The location and area of D Corporation (2): The project implementer: Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and 2,163 square meters (3 square meters): The details of the project progress of the defendant (4) on May 21, 2015;

B. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling of expropriation on February 9, 2017 (1) of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan E site expropriation (1): ① Section A 101, Dong-dong (90.32/1806.4, 1806.4, 180) Section A owned by the Plaintiff, ② Section B103, Dong-dong (90.32/1806.4, 1806.4, 1806.4) Section B owned by the Plaintiff, ③ Section C Section C Section 102 (90.32/180, 1806.4, 1806.4, 1806.4, 1806.4) Section B owned by the Plaintiff, and Section C Section 15, 3, 15, 15, 14, 15, 30, 15, 14, 15, 25, 31, 14, 25, 1, 4, etc.

2. Determination:

A. The plaintiffs' compensation for damages for the old building, computed in the decision to accept the plaintiffs' arguments, is low.

The amount of compensation according to the result of the court appraisal shall be increased.

The plaintiffs, as a result of the court appraisal, omitted the reflection of the development gains from designating the K District Unit Planning Zone, and ② the reflection of the development gains from Louts.