logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.04.29 2014고단714
사기미수등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 26, 2012, the Defendant sentenced the Changwon District Court to one year and six months for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on November 9, 2013.

1. The Defendant, from around December 2, 2013, served as a part-time student at the E convenience store operated by the victim D in Changwon-si Member C from around 21:30 on December 2, 2013.

At around 23:30 on the same day, the Defendant left the above convenience store, while keeping cash and cultural products in custody of the above convenience store for the victim, the Defendant used money and valuables worth KRW 589,260 in total, including cash 201,260, cash 133,000, cash 15,000, and cash 15,000, while being kept in the subsidy room, and money and valuables worth KRW 589,260,00, which were being kept in the reserve depository, for personal purposes, such as accommodation, in mind.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.

2. On December 8, 2013, around 12:30, the Defendant thief, within G legal party located in F of the window of Changwon-si, the Defendant: (a) covered the Defendant’s knife with his knife with his knife with his knife in order to drink his knife; and (b) 100,000 won in cash managed by the Defendant using the knife knife with his knife with his knife, one cellular phone; and (c) one knife with his knife with his knife with his knife inc.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

3. The Defendant attempted to commit fraud, around 13:30 on December 8, 2013, presented to the above-mentioned employees in his name the e-mail card of the I, which was stolen as if the Defendant was the Defendant’s card, but the said card was rejected due to lack of approval for the balance of the card, even though the Defendant presented to the above-mentioned employees in his name the e-mail card of the I, as described in the above paragraph (2) above.

arrow