A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. A habitual gambling Internet site B is an illegal gambling site operated as “if a member transfers money to a national bank account (D) in the name of the national bank account, which is the designated account of the above site, it will charge cyber money in such amount; if a member gets on a game, 5% of the amount of money on a deposit basis shall be recovered as a fee; if a member wishes, 5% of the amount of money on a deposit basis shall be recovered; and if a member wishes, exchange cyber money in cash.”

From January 8, 2014 to February 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) transferred KRW 12,976,000 in total from one bank account (G), credit union account (H), and agricultural cooperative account (I) in the name of one’s own partner; and (b) KRW 7,560,00 in total from one’s credit union account (J) to one’s national bank account in the name of one’s own partner; (c) received KRW 20,536,00 in cyber money; and (d) received KRW 20,536,00 in total from the said site from the said site and paid KRW 50 in advance seven points using Chapter 50 to one’s own cyber money; and (d) engaged in gambling over a period of up to KRW 200 to five thousand for each occupation.

2. On May 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 10:10 on the 165-12 Cyber Team receipt of the Cyber Team receipts from the Yansan Police Station located in Yansan-ro, 165-12, the Defendant was examined by the police officer K, etc.; and (b) on the interrogation protocol prepared by the said K, the Defendant stated “F” in the “person who made a statement” and the “verification” column of the investigation process confirmation attached to the said protocol.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged the signature of F, which is a private signature, for the purpose of exercising.

3. At the time and place specified in Paragraph 2, the Defendant: (a) issued the suspect interrogation protocol with a forged signature and a written confirmation of the investigation process to the above K, etc., and exercised the same as if the signature was duly signed.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.