1. The defendant's notary public against the non-party D has the executory power of 2006 No. 261 of the New Seoul Law Office.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 as to the facts of recognition, the Defendant, based on the notarial deed No. 1 of the Disposition No. 2014 and No. 2769 of this Court, with D as the obligor on August 22, 2014, issued an execution of the seizure of corporeal movables on the total of 20 items, including five items listed in the separate sheet No. 1204-903 (hereinafter “instant dwelling”) in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and 1204-903 (hereinafter “instant dwelling”). The Plaintiffs, with D’s children, have resided in the instant dwelling like D, 1 wall 2, 305,00 won among the items listed in the separate sheet No. 2 of the attached list, can be acknowledged that Plaintiff A purchased goods from Gmarket on October 20, 2010 to 3084,500 won.

2. In light of the above-finding facts as to the cause of the claim, and the fact that the defendant himself, at the second date for pleading, the articles Nos. 1 and 2 among the articles listed in the separate sheet, appears to have been settled by the plaintiff A, and that each of the articles listed in the sequence Nos. 3 through 5 (Attachment Nos 11 and 13) among the articles listed in the separate sheet is deemed not D, among the articles listed in the separate sheet, the articles listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 are owned by the plaintiff A and the articles listed in the separate sheet Nos. 3 through 5 among the articles listed in the separate sheet are deemed to be owned by the plaintiff B. Thus, the plaintiffs may seek against the defendant

3. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, on the ground that the plaintiffs' claims are with merit.