The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On November 5, 2018, at around 12:30 on November 12, 2018, the Defendant: (a) collected money from the mother in Busan Dong-gu B and C’s dwelling; and (b) “drawing a fright” from the victim D (the father) who is the father of the father, “drawing a large amount of sound at the house” was spawd, who was dissatisfied with this, and was pushed down with the victim’s candle.

The Defendant continued to boom the victim who was on the table and was frightened by the victim while the victim was frighten, and frightened by the victim, and frightened by the victim.

The parts of the victim's knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.

Accordingly, the defendant injured the victim who is a lineal ascendant.

2. Determination

A. First, we examine whether the Defendant saw the parts of the victim's knife with knife with a knife with the victim's knife with a knife with the victim

According to the records, the defendant committed violence, such as smugglinging the victim, and the fact that the victim was flickly flicked on the part of the victim's arms at the time is recognized.

However, with respect to the above reasons, the victim made a statement to the effect that "I would know how we would come to the upper part of the upper part of the body" at the time of the police statement once, but at the time of the second police statement, the victim made a inferred statement to the effect that "I would go to the upper part of the body" at the time of the second police statement. The victim made a statement to the effect that "I would go to the upper part of the body" was "I would know how we came to the upper part of the body," and it is difficult to view that the above body was a flive part of the body of the victim's arms when the police statement was made at the time of the second police statement to the effect that "I would go to the upper part of the body," and it is also difficult to see that the above body was a flive part of the body of the victim's arms at the time of the second police statement.

Therefore, the evidence presented by the prosecutor alone showed that the defendant was injured by the victim.