1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The fact that there is no dispute over the basic facts [based for recognition], the entry of Gap evidence Nos. 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, and 10, the result of the commission of physical examinations to the head of the Han Forestry University, the result of the commission of physical examinations to the head of the Han Forestry University, the result of the commission of medical examination to the head of the Central University's department

A. The defendant is a doctor who operates D located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 4th 402.

B. On September 25, 2010, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Defendant in a white paper on both sides.

On October 1, 2010, the Plaintiff received an operation from the Defendant for treatment in a lebane on the lebane on the lebane on October 1, 2010, and received an operation on October 8, 2010 on the lebane.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant surgery”). (C) An internal surgery on the shore shall be conducted.

After the instant surgery, from October 31, 2010 to October 09:00, the Plaintiff continued to provide severe pains on the left, and was diagnosed with an information infection by being inside the emergency room of the Ansan Hospital affiliated with the Korea National University University on the same day at around 18:25 the same day. The Plaintiff was hospitalized upon and hospitalized in the custody body as a result of medical treatment, injecting the antibiotics in the custody body, injecting the antibiotics, and injecting the antibiotics into the front bank. From the time of discharge, the Plaintiff was regularly provided guidance infections from the above hospital until January 5, 201.

On the other hand, it was not found that there was no cause germs causing the Plaintiff’s information infection as a result of the Doma and the spawn examination on the germs and spawn conducted on October 31, 2010 at the above Korea University Hospital.

E. The Plaintiff’s vision was about 1.0 degrees before the instant surgery. As above, the Plaintiff’s vision was reduced to 0.125 degrees as of May 3, 2013 after the instant infection occurred.

2. Determination as to the cause of the instant claim

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Defendant neglected to take measures to prevent spawn infection, such as thorough disinfection of the operation tools before the operation during the instant surgery, and caused the Plaintiff’s infections due to spawnitis in the Plaintiff’s seat. 2) The Defendant following the instant surgery.