logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.02.23 2017고합614
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복폭행등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, a public prosecution is instituted on December 7, 2017.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 High 614" 2018 High 614 / 2018 High 14 / [criminal career] Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for profit at the Seoul Southern District Court on March 26, 2015 and completed the execution of the sentence at the Jeonju Prison on March 13, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On November 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) while drinking alcohol on the road front of the Duski located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the road; (b) brought about a dispute with the victim E (45 years old); (c) the Defendant was fluencing the victim’s chest part of the victim’s breast part by making the victim’s breast part of the victim’s breast part one pushed-up, and flucing the victim’s chest part of the victim’s breast part on two occasions due to the brud hand, and flucing the victim’s chest part of the victim’s chest part of the victim’s breast part, which is a dangerous object that was placed on the side after walking, led the victim to the victim’s part above the number of days of treatment.

Accordingly, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim using plastic gambling, which is a dangerous thing.

2. On December 8, 2017, around 17:40 on December 17:40, 2017, the Defendant discovered the victims who drink with other homeless persons in the direction of D & C located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and subsequently reported to the police of B and B, “I and reported to the police of B,” and “I and reported.”

"," and the victim's face was taken by him/her continuously walking the victim, and then the victim's face was taken by several times.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim for the purpose of retaliation against the provision of the proviso of investigation such as reporting in relation to the investigation or trial of his criminal case.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment - - 2018 Gohap 14]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Images of CCTV images, such as damaged parts of photographs, etc. [2017 Gohap 614 - 2017 Gohap 614 for the crimes in its holding];

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. A police investigation report (on-site CCTV confirmation) / a reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, one copy of a personal acceptance status (2018, Gohap 14.

arrow