beta
Text
The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant Hyundai Industrial Development Corporation is dismissed.
Defendant AWS Co., Ltd.
Reasons
(c) shall be.
(2) Upon delegation of the power to notify the assignment of the instant claim, Defendant A&C notified Defendant A&C of the fact of the assignment of the instant claim, and filed a claim for damages. The area of the household’s exclusive ownership and the ratio of the said area to the exclusive ownership area of 49,588.57 square meters of the entire household (hereinafter “instant assignment ratio”).
In addition, the date of arrival of each assignment of claims and each claim for damages is as follows: A transfer notification (%) notification on the transfer ratio (%) of the entire area of land owned by a person holding a divided ownership of ASEAN transferred 28,227.6795 56.9237 September 4, 2013 (the first car 28,227.6795 on September 25, 2014 on September 4, 2013; 10,188.9260 on February 3, 2014; 20.5469 on April 4, 2014 on April 28, 2014; 1975 on April 27, 2075, 2075 on September 5, 2014, 204; 1950.017. 47, 47, 2014 on September 13, 2014;
The size size of the name name is 100*2100 each 100 223 FSD-2, each 900*2100 25 FSD-2, each 900 Rod 18,101,104,108,109 2020*2400 4 RSD 105,108 2002240 2002,1002,2400 2,1002,103,107 2380* 2380 240 4,102,100 240 2,240 2,2645*240 2,240 Do 1010,240 240 Do 240-410 Do 2402, 240 Do 21040 *
E. Meanwhile, the details and quantities of the fire doors constructed on the section for common use of the apartment of this case (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “instant fire doors”) are as follows.
2. The Defendants filed the instant lawsuit against the Defendants on July 11, 2013, which was prior to the instant lawsuit, seeking damages in lieu of the defect repair of the apartment complex (hereinafter “instant prior lawsuit”) by filing a lawsuit against the Seoul Southern District Court 2013Gahap11837, Seoul Southern District Court, which sought damages in lieu of the defect repair of the instant apartment complex (hereinafter “instant prior lawsuit”), and filed the instant lawsuit seeking damages in lieu of the defect repair of the apartment section for common use. Thus, the instant lawsuit constitutes a double lawsuit, and thus, the instant lawsuit is unlawful.