Defendants are not guilty.

1. Defendant A is the owner of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Western 302 (hereinafter this case lending) and Defendant B is the child of Defendant A.

On January 19, 2010, the Defendants entered the office of the Incheon District Court in the Dong-gu Incheon District Court near the Dong-dong, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Incheon, with the name-based administrative agent and the contents of the complaint, and had a named administrative agent who is unaware of the circumstances with Defendant A, along with the name-based administrative agent "J and the defendant B B 1)" around July 2005, 2005, the Defendants got off and stolen the precious metal owned by the complainant A and his wife, and 2) around July 18, 2005, the Defendants submitted the following documents to the Dong-dong Office in the name of the Seoul District Court to the effect that the complainant was stolen, and issued the seal impression and resident registration certificate using it, and then forged the documents concerning the sale of the loan of this case, such as the sales contract in the name of the complainant, and then transferred the ownership of the defendant to the Dong-dong Office in the name of the Seoul District Court."

However, on April 20, 191, Defendant B married with the Defendant J, which was the Defendant’s suit, but the agreement was reached on April 12, 2005. However, until January 2009, Defendant B, who was living together in the Defendant J’s residence and brought up ASEAN together, sought to dispose of the instant loan at the end of Defendant A and the end of his/her own debt settlement scheme. However, Defendant B was aware of the fact that the instant loan was too old so as to have a low possibility of sale, and that there was little cash that can be secured through this, even if the sale of snow was conducted, due to its complicated legal relationship.