A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seven years.

The application for compensation of this case is dismissed.

Criminal facts

On January 12, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for larceny at the Seoul Southern District Court, and on August 16, 2006, the Seoul High Court sentenced three years and six months of imprisonment for violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. on June 19, 2009 and completed the execution of the sentence. On August 19, 2010, the Seoul East East District Court sentenced three years of imprisonment for violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. on July 30, 2012.

1. On September 22, 2011, the Defendant: (a) at the Seocheon Prison District Court in Seoul Eastern District Court, “1” in relation to the case on which the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment; (b) at the Seoul East District Prosecutor D, the Defendant, as a witness of the criminal trial, instigated the thiee E to give false testimony; (c) on July 27, 2009, in order to manipulate the date of the crime among the contents of the statement made by the thief victim F, the Defendant sent the thiee G (name: G) who is the Defendant at the scene, arrested the her complainant on the spot, arrested the her sexual indecent act and adviser within the train; and (d) even though the victims did not have the date of the statement made by the thief, the Defendant conspiredd the victim with the police officer of abuse of authority and the duty to make a false criminal investigation report to the effect that the her principal statement was located in the burial; and (d) forged the content of the statement made by the Defendant in collusion.

3) As the victim of the larceny case of the complainant, F, as the accused, visited the complainant on July 27, 2009 and directly stolen the article, and “In spite of having made a statement, I testified to the purport that “I would like to have made a false testimony to the effect that I would have not visited the complainant.” (4) Defendant E, a witness, was present at the appellate trial of the larceny case, the complainant, and the complainant was present at our store around June 2009.