1. The Defendant each of the KRW 45,374,070 for Plaintiff A and C, KRW 13,80,000 for Plaintiff D, and KRW 12,00,000 for Plaintiff E and each of the above costs.

Basic Facts

A. The Plaintiff A and C are children of net G (H students, hereinafter “the deceased”) who jointly succeeded to the deceased, and the Plaintiff D and E are parents of the deceased.

B. around October 14, 2015, the Defendant operated the inn of “J” (hereinafter “the instant inn”) in the third floor in the building located in the Cheongju-si Office I of the Cheongju-si.

C. On October 14, 2015, K had long-term care in the instant 208, around October 14, 2015.

At the time, K used the heat processing equipment, such as electrical material and material resources, electric sales board, etc., in the instant brigade 208, but the Defendant did not prepare measures to prevent the occurrence of a fire, despite being aware of such fact.

On October 14, 2015, the Deceased caused a fire (hereinafter referred to as “instant fire”) due to the heat caused by the interruption of, and damage to, the internal electric wires used by, the above K, among those who were divingd by the said K as referred to in 208 in accordance with the above K on October 14, 2015.

E. After the occurrence of the above fire, the Defendant was unable to evacuate the Deceased, and the Deceased died on October 15, 2015 by massing around 01:15.

F. On October 7, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor for one year and two years of suspension of execution at the Cheongju District Court (No. 2016No. 558) of Cheongju District Court (No. 2016No. 558) of Cheongju District Court (No. 2016No. 201558), which stated that “The Defendant, as an operator of the instantn in a lodging facility, knew of the use of the electricity, scam, scam, electric scam, electric scambling, etc., and neglected to supervise it without proper supervision, and caused the death of the deceased due to a negligence that failed to establish a refuge plan

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 10, 13 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the above facts, the defendant is running a lodging business in the inn of the instantns, and a fire occurs in the inn of the instantns.