logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.08.22 2014고단788
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, as to the defendant B and C,

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s crime;

A. At around 07:30 on October 21, 2013, the Defendant, without a license, driven the said vehicle over about 1.3 kilometers from the front road of the “the head office, head office, and head office, and head office, and head office, and head office, and head office, and head office, and head office, and head office, and head office, and head office, and head office, and head office, and head office and office,

B. On October 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) while driving under the influence of alcohol as stipulated in paragraph (1) while he was under the influence of alcohol and led to an accident involving the median line in the upper part of the Northwest-dong Samsung-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoan-gu; (b) and (c) voluntarily driven along with G, etc. with the circumstances in which the F Zone Team of the YK was located in the YY and that the Defendant reported and sent.

At around 08:42 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) was a vehicle owned by the Defendant for the operation of the Defendant; (b) C, a passenger, made a statement to the police officer to the effect that “A (the Defendant) was driving a vehicle while driving the vehicle at the scene because it does not walk the vehicle at the time, and the police officers arrive at the scene.” On the arrival of the said zone, the Defendant and the Dong passenger denied driving by all the drivers; and (c) there are reasonable grounds to recognize the driving of the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol by the Defendant, such as the Defendant was driving at the inside and outside of the zone, and the Defendant was demanded to take a alcohol measurement at least three times from the above date to 09:15 on the same day, but did not comply with the measurement without justifiable grounds.

C. On October 2013, the Defendant: (a) asked B to the effect that, in order to escape punishment for the above drunk driving, the Defendant would not know the trade name in the vicinity of the Yongdong Yongdong at Asan-si; (b) asked B to the effect that “I am driven while making a drunk driving before it was discovered; and (c) I would like to request the police to undergo an investigation; and (d) calls the above C at a place where it is not known at the end of October 2013.

arrow