logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.02.05 2014고단1497
도로교통법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of four million won on December 10, 2012 due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and on December 20, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years, a community service order and an order to attend a lecture on August 20, 2013, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years, a community service order and an order to attend a lecture on December 28, 2013, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two or more times due to a drunk driving.

1. At around 05:00 on July 11, 2014, the Defendant, who was punished twice or more due to drunk driving as above, driven a BA-WD car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.234% under the influence of alcohol, without obtaining a car license, from the Do near the Sung-dong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Incheon to the roads near the 2km-dong located in the same Gu.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in driving a B-to-pur MD car.

At around 05:00 on July 11, 2014, the Defendant proceeded from the friendly feed side to the friendly apartment at a non-speed speed, along the four-lane radius located in the west-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu.

Since there is a centralized separation scheme, the driver of the motor vehicle is prohibited from driving the motor vehicle at a speed or by a method that may cause danger and obstacle to the surrounding area, and has the duty of care to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol as stated in Paragraph 1, neglected to drive without a license, and caused the centralized separation zone on the left side of the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the central separation zone owned by the astronomical Viewing and Viewers by occupational negligence so that the market is under repair costs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. D's self-written statements;

1. The actual survey report and the traffic accident;

arrow